RTX 3060 vs RX 6600
The RTX 3060 and the RX 6600 land close enough that neither is meaningfully faster. The choice between them comes down to memory, power draw and price rather than performance.
Too close to call
Under 5% apart, which is inside the range where the two trade places depending on the workload.
Where the gap is
Each row is scaled to the larger of the two values, so the bars show how much of the leader the other one reaches — not a shared scale across rows. The real figure is printed on every bar.
Side by side
| Specification | RTX 3060 | RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance index | 3900 | 3800 |
| Memory | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Power draw | 170 W | 132 W |
| Performance per watt | 22.9 | 28.8 |
| Architecture | — | RDNA 2 |
| Generation | RTX 30 Series | RX 6000 Series |
How the gap is worked out
The percentage compares the two parts on the same relative performance index the site's bottleneck and build tools use, expressed as a share of the slower one. It is a single combined figure, not a frame rate: a specific game at a specific resolution can and will land either side of it, and a card with more memory pulls further ahead the moment a title needs that memory. Treat it as the size of the gap, not as a measurement of your machine.
What each one needs to run
The RTX 3060 and the RX 6600 do not draw the same power, and the difference often outlives the card — a supply is the part you keep. Each page works the total out for a complete system.
Pair it with a processor
A faster card only shows up as faster frames if the processor can keep up with it. The bottleneck detector takes both and says which one is holding the other back.
Open the bottleneck detector